Featured Post -

News 1
News 2
News 3
News 4




Showing posts with label US. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US. Show all posts

Google Has Had Enough: Files Lawsuit To Ban Multiple Apple Products

Tuesday, September 4, 2012 0 comments


 

I knew this day would come. I can’t say that I hoped for it, but in all honesty, it was inevitable. Apple has been very busy lately in doing all it can to ban as many Android devices as it can, and HTC, Samsung, and Motorola have all recently got a small taste of the Apple juice lately. But something has changed: Google now owns Motorola, and aren’t wasting any time in defending their new acquisition, as they are now seeking a sales ban on the iPhone, iPad, and Mac computers in the US. This time, it’s personal, and contains a twist that could potentially make this particular lawsuit a very dangerous one for Apple.

This is the first case that Google has signed off on in defending their new hardware company, meaning that there’s no more lurking in the background providing support. This is full on Google with their law team directly involved. This isn't Google watching from the sidelines, but instead, they are calling this one play by play. But Google and Motorola were clever, as this isn't a lawsuit that focuses on silly topics such as icons or square shaped tablets.

Google and Motorola are claiming patent infringement for non-standard essential patents. To put it simply, Google-rola has filed a case for a patent that courts cannot legally force companies to license, meaning that if they win this case, Apple could be forced to completely stop using the technology in their devices.

We don’t have confirmation on exactly which patent (reportedly "wifi related") is in question here, but we do know that Motorola attempted to reach licensing agreements with Apple (since 2010), which Apple apparently refused. Motorola stated that:
We would like to settle these patent matters, but Apple’s unwillingness to work out a license leaves us little choice but to defend ourselves and our engineers’ innovations”.
(UPDATE: (FOSS Patents is reporting that one of the non standard essential patents in question is for a "sensor controlled user interface for portable communication device", but does not directly specify a wifi related patent. There is still one more non standard essential patent in question, but the specifics of this patent aren't clear at this time. I will contact FOSS Patents and ZDNET (source) for new developments).
This is a big one for Google and for Apple. This isn’t just an OEM that Apple is dealing with now. This is one of the most powerful (if not THE most powerful) movers and shakers in the world. If this comes to trial, Apple could really have its hands full, and might even be forced to rely on Microsoft for backup. **shudders**

The patent wars involving Android and Apple have now reached new heights, and with Google in the center, I have a feeling that things could get very very ugly for the companies that have sought to ban Android products. That being said, you never know how this case could go with the state of the current patent system. 
Additional souces: Bloomberg and Mobilenapps

P.S - I still can't believe this article has gone SO viral. We didn't even break this story, and as you can see, I wrote it over a week ago ! Thank you so much for helping spread it around, and I will do my best to update it with more information as I receive it. If you happen to get your hands on information that's not so public yet, let me know so I can update the article!

Picture credits: Vimeo.com (edited by myself)

The Future Of Microsoft Is Sunny With A Chance Of Thunderstorms

Thursday, June 21, 2012 0 comments

The past few years haven’t been kind to Microsoft. (There’s no need to walk down memory lane. We all know what’s happened.) But somehow that’s all changed in the past few days. Surface andWindows Phone 8, along with Windows 8 andXbox prove there’s still some fight left in the old dog. It’s a bit premature to say that the company is back and that the decades long string of mediocrity coming out of Redmond is over but the company is clearly focused and we haven’t seenthat Microsoft in a long, long time.
The shroud of mystery surrounding the Surface announcement earlier this week in LA had the press in a tizzy. We’d all been burned one too many times and the thought of something lame being announced loomed large. It is Microsoft, after all. What they managed to pull off was nothing short of spectacular, though. Microsoft employees were kept in the dark with most finding out at the same time as press. This wasn’t a case where employees were being sheepish with details either. Most simply had no idea.
Rumors surrounding the event swirled with some being sort of right and some being flat out wrong. The reason Surface was kept under wraps so tightly has a lot to do with the company’s horizontal product line. A vertically integrated one can lead to leaks due to the number of folks involved. There’s a reason Tim Cook said at D10 that Apple would be doubling down on security. Loose lips sink ships.
Like any Microsoft announcement though, the detractors came out in full force during and after the Surface announcement. Why have a Pro model? Why not announce pricing and availability? Why not let anyone try the Touch Cover? Couldn’t agree more.
Others, however, decided to scold Microsoft for “screwing” their hardware partners. First of all, Microsoft isn’t screwing the OEMs, they’re simply challenging them to do better. Fact is, both sides have been screwing each other for decades. Microsoft is simply setting the bar and the manufacturers need to put up or shut up so long as Microsoft delivers the software. And that’s still a big if. But the OEMs only have themselves to blame. A sentiment felt by others.
Analysts quoted in a Reuters report were quick to shoot down Surface saying Microsoft needed to undercut Apple’s iPad to be competitive.
“Analysts expect the slimmer Windows 8 tablet to struggle to compete with the iPad, which offers over 225,000 apps, and to a lesser extent with Google Inc’s Android-based tablets, such as the Samsung’s Galaxy Tab.”
Maybe Reuters just doesn’t know what they’re talking about? At best, this is pretty laughable. For starters, the product isn’t finished and hasn’t shipped. And to be honest, the whole app argument doesn’t apply here. The two use-case scenarios are completely different. The Surface may be similar in form to the iPad but it’s geared towards productivity and real multi-tasking. Why do you think they slammed a keyboard into the cover? Yes, Windows 8 and the entire Windows eco-system lack the sheer volume of apps found in iOS and Android but what more do you need than email, a web browser and Office on a device like the Surface?
Whereas the iPad is clearly being used to consume content, not creating it. As hard as Apple has tried at every iPad unveil to convince developers that the hardware can drive amazing software like Garage Band, iPhoto and Pages/Numbers/Keynote, the iPad remains an entertainment focused device. When you’re making billions of dollars off other people’s work why fight the power? Just bask in its glory and reap the rewards, I say.

I enjoyed the teaser video for Surface as much as the next guy/gal but that screamed Droid/Verizon marketing. Verizon killed it with that campaign. There’s a reason why most people assume that any Android device is simply called Droid. Whoever was in charge of that video and marketing as a whole going forward for Surface really needs to think of something distinctive and unique to the Surface brand.
The excitement drummed up on Monday trickled over to today’s public acknowledgement and developer preview of Windows Phone 8. Microsoft says Channel 9 saw more views today than past events. (To be honest, they haven’t had that much exciting news to share anyway.) Some might call that positive momentum.
Windows Phone 8 signals a massive momentum shift for the unification of Windows as a whole. A shared kernel with Windows adds enough incentive for developers to build for both without even thinking about it. But this group still has an uphill battle ahead of them. To date there hasn’t been a single “hero” or flagship device for the platform. Everywhere you look across the lineup you see a blank slate of black slabs. Aside from the Lumia 900, every other device in the lineup looks like every other device in the Android lineup.
Today Microsoft revealed the roadmap for current Windows Phone device owners to upgrade to a neutered version of the next OS, Windows Phone 7.8. It didn’t have to be that way, though. By all accounts, what we were shown today is a small portion of what Windows Phone 8 is. By announcing that 7/7.5 devices might only see a new Start Screen could be equated to suicide. Why would a potential buyer go and buy a device now knowing the next crop of devices in the fall will carry an updated and arguably better OS that will likely be future proof? Way to alienate your current customers and possibly push them towards another platform this coming fall.
They should have kept mum on the whole thing or declared that every software feature in WP8 would be applicable to existing devices. At least offer developers Native Code support. Wallet is compelling enough that you don’t really need NFC to reap the benefits of what it has to offer. Announcing that the Start Screen might be the only thing that ports over was fucking stupid. Classic Microsoft. Classic.
Still, there’s hope. Microsoft has yet to finalize Windows Phone 8 and what 7.8 could be. If enough developers jump on board and create some killer speech recognition apps like this, then Siri definitely has some competition. You also have hardware partners like Nokia building out and updating apps for current Lumia owners. Future WP8 Nokia devices will also ship with Nokia Maps, which is arguably some of the best turn-by-turn navigation software available and it’s free!
Where the Finnish handset maker fell short with the Lumia 900 was the camera. AT&T and even Nokia marketing touted the Carl Zeiss lens and folks at both Microsoft and Nokia will tell you (maybe not you but I’ve heard it from both sides) how disappointing it’s been. Nokia, however, has proven thatPureView as a technology is more than capable of capturing some amazing images. You won’t see a 41-megapixel camera in the next WP8 device from Nokia but you will see the core technology coupled with Scalado (Nokia is in the process of acquiring the team and IP) in an upcoming device. HTC is also doubling down on camera enhancements so competition will hopefully drive even further innovation. I standby my previous statement that Samsung will only dabble.
What Microsoft showcased today and earlier this week proves the company has finally come to its senses. It also highlights how vulnerable they’ve made themselves by setting such high expectations. Can they deliver? We’ll see but for now I’m excited to see how the rest of this year plays out.

Windows Phone 8 Is A Great Big, Crazy, Beautiful Mess

0 comments



The Lumia 900 sold me on Windows Phone. The 900 is a marriage of fresh hardware with a fun operating system. I dig the Start Screen with the Live Tiles. There are some shortcomings. The camera sucks, to be sure, and the phone isn’t yet available on Verizon. Plus, after using the phone for several weeks, it was clear that the phone’s large screen is wasted on Windows Phone 7.5. It’s more of the same concerning the 900′s HTC cousin, the Titan II. Microsoft clearly agrees.
Full disclaimer: I haven’t touched a Windows Phone 8 device yet. That said, it’s hard to look at the several dozen screen shots and demo videos from today’s event and not be excited about the future of Windows Phone 8. Yes, it’s a busy interface. But my oh my the new Start Screen is – if I may – a clusterfuck of goodness.
Windows had some cojones releasing Windows 7 some 18 months ago. It was totally different. It lacked key features. It had poor hardware and carrier support. But clearly ignoring analysts, pundits and ignorant bloggers, Redmond kept at it, steadily releasing updates that solve current issues while introducing new features.
The current release, Windows 7.5, is a solid mobile platform worthy of serious consideration. Admittedly, it’s not necessarily better than Android or iOS, but rather different in key ways that make it special. And now with Windows Phone 8, and in the interim, Windows Phone 7.8, the core system might actually be better than its competitors.
The new Start Screen that will debut on some current devices with Windows Phone 7.8. The Live Tiles are now customizable, allowing owners to completely reshape their Start Screen in a grid of application shortcuts. What’s more, an upcoming SDK will allow app developers to utilize this ability and craft their respective Live Tile for different sizes and functions.
This evolution matches the industry’s trend of supersized phone screens. Why have a relatively standard grid of Live Tiles when there is so much screen real estate on new phones? Short answer: With Windows Phone 7.8 and 8, you don’t have to!
Microsoft is allowing phone owners to totally customize their phone in ways not possible with iOS and Android. All iPhones look the same but no Windows Phone 8 device will look like any other. For better or worse, this organized chaos is a result of a philosophy that has always centered around users getting tasks down quickly. The New Start Screen is just the next step towards this goal – and it’s totally fresh.
Microsoft pulled out all the stops on today’s Windows Phone 8 event. Plus, this was just a preview of the Windows Phone 8 and 7.8. More info will come later. It was a media bonanza complete with pre-briefings and the like. Microsoft is clearly proud of its new baby and wanted to show it off — just like it did two days back with the Surface unveiling. It’s also clear that Microsoft has found a new swagger. Microsoft might be back.


Facebook Browser Is Imminent [RUMOR]

Friday, May 25, 2012 0 comments


Are you ready for a Facebook browser that integrates the social networking behemoth into your online life more than ever? That’s exactly what could be on the way soon, according to one report.
A Friday Pocket-lint report cites a “trusted source” that Facebook wants to buy Opera Software — manufacturers of the Opera web browser, which claims more than 200 million users worldwide. The Facebook browser would include default menu bar plugins, further permeating Facebook into users’ general web experience, according to the report.
A Facebook spokesperson declined Mashable‘s request for comment.
A custom browser would be a significant step toward Facebook becoming your web, as opposed to just an Internet site you visit and service you use. Opera’s mobile browser has received strong reviews online, meaning a functional Facebook browser using it could be even more powerful. Facebook has struggled to penetrate mobile use as deeply as many think it should be able to — and will need to in order to sustain long-term growth.
A Facebook browser would also bolster the newly public company’s competition with GoogleGoogle Chromerecently became the web’s most-used browser, but Facebook’s gigantic user base of more than 900 million people would present a potential serious threat down the line. It would be interesting to see Facebook try to battle Google for browser dominance as Google+ struggles to play catchup in social networking.
We’ll see if the Opera rumors are true, but if Pocket-lint‘s “man in the know” is even remotely hooked in, it’s not hard to imagine the arrival of a Facebook browser being only a matter of time.
How could a Facebook browser help the company take over the web — or can it? Share your perspective in the comments.

Post Facebook IPO, Your Brain And Its Data Are Worth $91.44 To Mark Zuckerberg

Tuesday, May 22, 2012 0 comments


Facebook’s lukewarm IPO may have created fewer millionaires than some hoped. But it’s cemented Mark Zuckerberg’s position as the richest man in America in the business of herding attention spans and siphoning personal details from human brains into corporate servers.

Now that the dust has settled and Facebook has traded on NASDAQ for a day, it’s possible to gauge more precisely than ever before how much the company is worth, and with that number, how much of its value derives from its relationship with each of the 900 million people who visit the site on a regular basis, gaze at and click on its ads, and feed its databases with some of their most private bits of information: By my count, an average of around $91 per user.

Facebook ended its first day of trading as a public company with a market capitalization of $104.9 billion. Subtract out its assets like real estate, servers, and cash from that total value of the company, as well as the payment business that accounts for close to 17% of its revenue, and Facebook’s entire advertising business is worth $82.3 billion. Dividing that by the roughly 900 million active users that the site last disclosed, I calculate that each of those individuals’ advertising value is $91.44.

That number, the average value Facebook’s shareholders now place on the eyeballs, personal preferences, and shared secrets of its users, is subject to wide variation, of course: Users in developing countries and inactive users are probably worth less, and high-income, well-connected, click-happy and oversharing users are likely worth far more. The privacy-focused Web firm Abine released a tool prior to the IPO that allowed users to enter details like where they live and how many friends they have to determine their value to Facebook, though that calculator also included Facebook’s revenue from virtual payments, which have less to do with users’ personal data than Facebook’s advertising business.

In a talk last March at the American Bar Association’s antitrust chapter, Senator Al Franken reminded the audience that free services online like Google and Facebook have more user data than ever before, and less incentive than ever to respect users’ privacy as they seek to cash in on it. ”You are not their client,” he said. “you are their product.”

Move Over Harvard And MIT, Stanford Has The Real “Revolution In Education”

Thursday, May 10, 2012 0 comments


Lectures are often the least educational aspect of college; I know, I’ve taught college seniors and witnessed how little students learn during their four years in higher education. So, while it’s noble that MIT and Harvard are opening their otherwise exclusive lecture content to the public with EdX, hanging a webcam inside of a classroom is a not a “revolution in education”.
A revolution in education would be replacing lectures with the Khan Academy and dedicating class time to hands-on learning, which is exactly what Stanford’s medical school proposed last week. Stanford realizes that great education comes from being surrounded by inspiring peers, being coached by world-class thinkers, and spending time solving actual problems.
To give a little background, last week, Harvard and MIT made headlines with the launch of EdX, a joint online education initiative that will place lectures from the best instructors online, complete with reading material, automated quizzes, wiki-style forums, and a tailored assessment of progress. Essentially, EdX slightly expands the existing MIT OpenCourseWare with some basic forum and feedback technology–technology that has been around since the dial-up days of the late 90′s (and what universities have had since the invention of the Scantron). MIT OpenCourseWare has been wildly popular, with over 125 million lifetime visitors; so, the new EdX will certainly be useful for the existing base of MIT students who use it in deciding their course schedule and those in the public who want to enhance a neatly organized syllabus of readings with some occasional online chats.
But, saying that EdX is “the biggest change in education since the invention of the printing press” ignores the fact that lectures are often the least educational aspect of college: after four years of instruction, research shows that many students haven’t mastered basic reasoning or communication skills. Students forget most of what they hear in lecture and then only recall 40% of the tested material two years later. Lectures do little for students actually enrolled in the school, let alone the millions of online users who will study part-time, without a supportive community or frequent feedback from a professor.
So, last week, two Stanford professors made a courageous proposal to ditch lectures in the medical school. “For most of the 20th century, lectures provided an efficient way to transfer knowledge, But in an era with a perfect video-delivery platform — one that serves up billions of YouTube views and millions of TED Talks on such things as technology, entertainment, and design — why would anyone waste precious class time on a lecture?,” write Associate Medical School dean, Charles Prober and business professor, Chip Heath, in The New England Journal of Medicine. Instead, they call for an embrace of the “flipped” classroom, where students review Khan Academy’s YouTube lectures at home and solve problems alongside professors in the classroom. Students seem to love the idea: when Stanford piloted the flipped classroom in a Biochemistry course, attendance ballooned from roughly 30% to 80%.
Skeptical readers may argue that Khan Academy can’t compete with lectures from the world’s great thinkers. In response, Prober and Heath point to a recent one-week study that compared the outcomes of two classes, a control class that received a lecture from a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and an experimental section where students worked with graduate assistants to solve physics problems. Test scores for the experimental group (non-lecture) was nearly double that of the control section (41% to 74%).
“Students are being taught roughly the same way they were taught when the Wright brothers were tinkering at Kitty Hawk,” they explain. After a revolution, an organization should bear little resemblance to its former self. Harvard and MIT have merely placed the 20th century education model online. Stanford, on the other hand, is completely doing away with the old model of the “sage on the stage” and embracing a learning environment that mirrors life forever connected to the world’s information.
[Image via the University of Waterloo.]

Smart Education: How Lynda.com Hit $70M In Revenue Without A Penny From Investors

0 comments


As Ned Flanders would say, education in the U.S. is in “a dilly of a pickle.” At the risk of sounding like a broken record, the cost of education has become unsustainable. Student loan debt is over $1 trillion, unemployment remains high for the recently graduated, and non-traditional students — older people, single mothers, workers looking to re-train — are returning to academia and learning programs in droves, putting even more competitive pressure on already-scant on-site resources. Higher ed institutions struggle with the cost of expanding to meet demand. Yale, for example, recently decided to add 250 students to its incoming class, which came with a price tag of a quarter of a billion dollars.
Luckily, a number of startups are tackling the problem, which, along with the maturation of online content distribution channels, are helping to lower the cost of higher, primary, and continuing education — both making it easier for teachers to do what they do best as well as transforming learning into something that’s more engaging and personalized for students. Startups like Khan Academy, 2tor, ShowMe, Udemy, Udacity, Grockit, Coursera, and StraighterLine are all beginning to show how easy it is to flip the educational process — in other words, to use video and advanced web platforms to make learning more affordable and effective.
However, while these startups should be recognized for their mission-driven approaches, some of these startups evidence undercooked business models, obviously a problem for for-profit businesses when the funding (if there is any) dries up. There’s also plenty of money to go around in Silicon Valley right now, and many startups have become way too focused on raising seed and Series A financing, which can be detrimental to the system and a distraction for founders.
That’s why the story of Lynda.com has such relevance in today’s landscape. Founded in the ’90s, the company is, compared to the slew of year-old edtech startups, an old-hand. For those unfamiliar, Lynda.com offers a virtual video library of over 1,200 educational, how-to videos. Unlike the awesome Khan Academy, Lynda’s video courses are taught by industry experts, working professionals, and veteran teachers, served up in installments for a monthly subscription fee of about $25.
In 2010, Lynda delivered over 1,000 hours of content, and while it provides its paid online learning content to individuals, today it also works with nearly all of the Ivy League schools as well as companies, like Disney, Time Warner, Sony, Pixar, ABC, and HBO to supplement their learning content. What’s also different about Lynda, and perhaps old-school given today’s emerging DIY online video models, is that it produces 90 percent of its content in-house. It’s a big video production operation beyond simply being an online distribution platform.
Since the beginning, Lynda.com has been focused on tech content, offering how-to videos on some of the most popular apps from Adobe, Apple, Autodesk, and Microsoft — on everything from web design to learning to use Excel in a way that doesn’t make you want to blow your brains out.
Content companies have struggled to monetize on the Web, and there has been plenty of debate over the effectiveness of paywalls. Newspapers are finally starting to see growth in their circulations, and ABC’s figure for daily Times paid digital subscribers was 807,000, with the WSJ in second at 552,288. Of course, as the NYTimes points out, under audit rules, newspapers can count paid digital subscribers more than once if they have access to multiple platforms, like apps, tablets, etc.
This means that, as a content company, Lynda.com is looking pretty good in comparison. Yes, the Times’ digital offerings are much younger, but Lynda currently has over 1 million paying members and saw 42 million uniques over the last 12 months — a 20 percent increase from the year prior. That’s not mind blowing, as there are a number of digital publications and blogs that see that much unique traffic in a month, rather than a year. But the real kicker is that Lynda hit $70 million in revenues in 2011.
Co-founders (and couple) Lynda Weinman and Bruce Heavin started by sinking $20K from their savings into Lynda. They were profitable, Heavin says, within a few weeks, and they haven’t taken a penny of outside funding since. And that’s not for lack of offers, as both founders hinted that sizable investment offers have been put on the table on a number of occasions. But the company has been content to fly under the radar and rely on word-of-mouth marketing, subscribing to a “if you don’t need money, don’t take it” policy.
The real key to the company’s success is how it’s become an alternative to the Demand Medias and eHows of the world. Lynda.com won’t blow you away with shiny graphics or interactivity, its videos often do a lot of screen-sharing, with narration from experts laid over it. But, as the company now has some-300 employees and has an increasingly professional studio north of Los Angeles, the production quality of its videos is high.
Compared to Khan, YouTube how-tos, or eHow, Lynda’s videos are offered in installments, and depending on what users want to learn, they can graduate to more advanced content as they move up the ladder. For example, Lynda is about to publish its 500th course on Adobe apps and software, which is ridiculous. CS6 begins shipping on Monday, and Lynda already has courses for the creative suite ready to go.
These courses on advanced PhotoShop, for example, may include up to 10 hours of content, broken down into 60-odd subgroups. While it’s not true for every subject, Lynda.com can be as basic or as advanced as you’re willing to go. And, with the growing interest in programming and coding education, the buzz around CodeAcademy being one example, the company is beginning to get very serious about expanding and diversifying its content around programming languages and web development.
For educators and teachers, part of the appeal of Lynda is that they’re guaranteed a paycheck for the content they help produce. Since Lynda herself is a veteran of the publishing industry, the site’s compensation model is not unlike which one finds in book deals. Once teachers are vetted (and the co-founders told me they find more than 50 percent of the time that authors don’t necessarily make great teachers), they’re given an advance for their work. From there, the company offers a cut of revenues depending on the popularity of their videos.
Even if the videos don’t blow up, the teachers are guaranteed that supplementary revenue stream. But, somewhat surprisingly, the co-founders tell us that nearly 90 percent of its educators earn their entire annual income by producing videos for Lynda.com.
In the end, having been able to weather the stampede of content producers to the Web, and grow its business to $70 million in revenues, it seems that its founders might have some valuable perspective for startups and young entrepreneurs looking to do the same. Like many others, the co-founders began the process with other income streams, and it took almost 5 years before its online content was outpacing the number of courses they themselves were teaching in the classroom.
But what they kept coming back to was the fact that they started their business not as eager young people looking to get rich quick or find some niche to exploit, like becoming the Airbnb for pets, they were experts — and they were passionate about education. Weinman herself had been working in web design and film special effects, along with teaching, for years — and had published several books.
The co-founders attribute the success of Lynda.com to becoming industry insiders before becoming entrepreneurs, and on focusing on the product before profit. Allow your customers to keep you honest, they said, and listen to their feedback to help push your business forward. Early on, everything they had and made was poured into Lynda.com. As Heavin said, it took years of “walking through the desert,” before they were able to see any real profit, but being passionate about finding better ways to educate people using online tools, and taking into account the modalities of learning — being intimately familiar with their user or target customer — can lead to a positive result.
As to what’s next, Lynda.com just added a course queue so that users can keep track of and save subjects or chapters they’re interested in watching later and will be continuing the expansion of its educational content for developers. And, since 20 percent of its users are international and its content is presently English-only, the company hopes to eventually begin translating its videos into other languages. Hopefully sooner rather than later.

Trolling Could Get You 25 Years in Jail in Arizona

Tuesday, April 3, 2012 0 comments

One of the Internet's basic tenets—the right to be as much of a myopic, infantile asshat as humanly possible—is currently under attack in Arizona. A sweeping update to the state's telecommunications harrasment bill could make naughty, angry words a Class 1 misdemeanor. Or worse.
It's a dangerous precedent, yet another bill written and supported by legislators who fundamentally don't understand the nature of the internet. And I'm not just being a, well, you know.
Arizona House Bill 2549 passed both legislative houses last Thursday and is now awaiting approval from Arizona's governor Brewer. The statute states that:
"It is unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend, to use a ANY ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DEVICE and use any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggest any lewd or lascivious act, or threaten to inflict physical harm to the person or property of any person."
Emphasis added. If the electronic devices and means are employed to stalk a victim, the penalty bumps up to a Class 3 felony.
For those not intimately familiar with Arizona penal law, a Class 1 misdemeanor is punishable by a $2,500 fine and up to six months in jail (it's the most aggressive misdemeanor charge the state can bring). A Class 3 felony, meanwhile, carries a minimum sentence of 2.5 years for non-dangerous offenders with no prior record. And a max of 25 years in jail.
Opponents of the bill argue that the wording is overly broad and could easily be interpreted to include not just one-on-one communications but public forums like 4Chan, Reddit, and anywhere else that allows commenting. You thought the banhammer was bad? Try handcuffs.
It could also have a chilling effect on free speech by prohibiting shocking or "profane" language online. And since the bill stipulates that the offense only has to occur on Arizona soil (since a Facebook comment is definitely a geographic place, right?) that basically puts the entire Internet on notice.
The bill's supporters argue that the steps are necessary to prevent online bullying. Despite the public outcry, the bill has seen very little resistance from elected officials. However, given how well Arizona's other recent, short-lived, and generally draconian propositions—-including itsracial profilinganti-gay adoption, and anti-immigration bills—-have fared, House Bill 2549 might not be a law for long, assuming Governor Brewer even signs it.
In the mean time, feel free to leave your thoughts on the matter on Brewer's Facebook page. You know, while it's still legal. [Arizona State House of Reps via CBLDF]







Houston, We Have Liftoff: Human BirdWings Guy Finally Enjoys The Miracle Of Human Flight

Tuesday, March 20, 2012 0 comments

While I am indeed guilty of being pretty fly for a white guy, it’s never been able to help me achieve my life-long dream of actual flight. You know, in the air, like a bird. Or maybe like Superman or Captain Planet. Hence my excitement back in December when we caught wind of a mechanical engineer from the Netherlands who was pulling out all the stops to transform this dream into a reality. His name? Mr. Jarno Smeets. At the time, however, his so-called HumanBirdWings project was just in its infancy.
Smeets was busy trying to manage a successful pairing of the accelerometers of a WiiMote and an HTC Wildfire S, which would together allow him to control the outrunners on his giant, self-built wings. Gradually, the engineer honed his mechanical pinions to the point at which, in late January, he actually took flight. Well, when we say “flight,” we really mean that the motion consisted more of two or three extended hops. But, damn you, it was progress.
Today, Jarno took his wings out for a second/tenth try, and, in the process, may just have made semi-self-propelled aeronautical history. We’ll check on that, but as far as hacks go, this one is pretty high up there. Finding just the right concoction of wind velocity, speed of departure, and whispered Hail Marys, Jarno today flew over 100 meters on his self-built wings.
Move over Orville, Wilbur, and Leo da Vinci, there’s a new birdman in town. After 8 months of hard work, research, and testing, this mechanical engineer was able to defy gravity and participate in the miracle of self-propelled, human flight.
His inspiration? Why the majestic albatross, of course. If only Samuel Taylor were here to see this.
For more, check out Jarno’s blog, which provides a glimpse into his work.
But, without further ado, here’s Jarno in flight:

Indians cross 3 million mark in US, 1 million have voting rights

Friday, March 9, 2012 0 comments

WASHINGTON: They are caricatured through convenience store owner Apu in the cartoon series The Simpsons, celebrated for their victories in Spelling Bee contests and success in Silicon Valley entrepreneurship, and courted for their wealth given their status as the ethnic group with the highest per capita income in U.S. Sometimes they are also chastised for not being part of the American mainstream. 



But Indian-Americans are getting there. A demographic snapshot of South Asians in the United States crunched out from the 2010 U.S Census by an NGO group shows the Indian-American population in the U.S (including multiple ethnicities) grew 68 per cent over the 2000-2010 decade from 1.9 million to 3.19 million. Counting single ethnicity (discounting mixed race), the population grew from 1.67 million to 2.84 million in the same period. 

That made Indian-Americans the third largest Asian-American group in the U.S after Chinese-Americans (3.79 million) and Filipino-Americans (3.42 million), but with a much faster growth rate. People who identified themselves as Indian origin comprise the largest segment of the 3.4 million-strong ''South Asian Americans,'' a 1990s nomenclature engineered by the Washington mandarins. 

According to data released by the Asian American Foundation and Saalt, an organization devoted to strengthening South Asian Communities in America, the voting age population of Indian-Americans (who are U.S citizens) has now crossed 1 million. It grew 100 per cent from 2000, when it was 576,000, to 1.15 million in 2010. 

While the South Asian community as a whole grew 78 per cent over the past decade, the Indian-American growth rate, however, was the slowest in this group. The Bangladeshi community experienced the most significant growth, jumping 212 per cent to 147,300 in 2010. The combined Bhutanese and Nepali populations grew by at least 155 per cent. 

Pakistani-Americans, the second largest among South Asian Americans grew 100 per cent, from 204,000 in 2000 to 409,000 in 2010, while Sri Lankans went up 85 per cent from 24,500 to 45,400. Pakistanis claim to be at least a million-strong in the U.S, but the data shows they are less than half-million, and voting population of Pakistani-Americans (U.S citizens) is only 161,000. 

Such census data diced to show the demographics of ethnic groups and nationalities is considered important for stakeholders to undertake advocacy with government entities and make funding requests. State and federal lawmakers can also use the data to deepen engagement with the communities and reflect their concerns in policymaking. 

In fact, the census data also reflects changing geographical distribution of South Asian Americans. The top five metropolitan areas for Indian-Americans are New York, Chicago, Washington DC, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. For Pakistanis it is New York, Houston, Chicago, Washington DC, and Dallas. Over the past ten years, the Washington DC metropolitan area overtook the Los Angeles metropolitan area as the area with the third largest South Asian population. 

Outside the big metropolitan cities, the South Asian population grew the most in Charlotte, North Carolina, increasing 187 per cent over the past ten years. This was followed by Phoenix (Arizona), Richmond (Virginia), Raleigh (North Carolina), San Antonio (Texas), Seattle (Washington), Stockton (California), Jacksonville (Florida), Harrisburg (Pennsylvania), and Las Vegas (Nevada).
Like and Share this news so that more number of people could read it. Thanks.

GOOGLE INTRODUCES GOOGLE PLAY, THE NEW VERSION OF THE ANDROID MARKET

Tuesday, March 6, 2012 0 comments


We've seen the Android Market undergo multiple facelifts and gain new offerings since its inception, but today the Market is going to see possibly its biggest change yet. Google today introduced Google Play, which is the new brand that's taking the place of the Android Market, Google Music and the Google eBookstore. Like the Android Market before it, Google Play will offer Android apps as well as music, movies and books. Google also notes that the music, books and movies apps will be rebranded as Google Play Music, Google Play Books and Google Play Movies. Devices running Android 2.2 or something newer can expect to see their Market app updated automatically sometime in the coming days.
To celebrate the big change, Google has announced that it'll be offering a special discount on one book, album, video rental and Android app each day for the next week. The first batch of discounted items in the "7 Days to Play" sale includes the album Now That's What I Call Music 41, the game Where's My Water, the novel Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close and the movie Puncture for 25 cents each. Other items in each category will see slightly less drastic discounts as well, with some albums priced at $3.99 apiece, books from $2.99, movies for 99 cents and apps from 49 cents.
Today's move comes as a bit of a surprise since we've gotten so used to the Android Market over the years, but it looks like Google decided that it wanted to unite the Market, Google Music, and its books and movies stores under the same Google Play brand. As you can see in the promotional video for Play below, Google also seems to be pushing the cloud as a big component of Play, touting features like the fact that users can buy an item (app, song, etc.) and have it appear on their devices automatically. What do you all make of the Google Play rebranding?

 
CrackleTech © 2011 | Designed by WetCanvas Inc.