Featured Post -

News 1
News 2
News 3
News 4




Showing posts with label Warren Buffett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Warren Buffett. Show all posts

The Warren Buffett Haters Club

Wednesday, February 29, 2012 0 comments

After his manifesto in the New York Times last August titled “Stop Coddling the Super-Rich,” Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Warren Buffett—a man who had seemed universally admired in capitalist circles for both his business acumen and kindly Midwestern disposition—found himself under attack. In the article he’d questioned a tax code in favor of the “mega-rich,” and declared “it’s time for a shared sacrifice.” A Republican chorus called on him to simply open his checkbook if he felt his taxes were too low. Corporate titans such as former General Electric (GE) Chairman Jack Welch and former American Express (AXP) CEO Harvey Golub expressed their disappointment, as well. Now that the Obama administration hopes to make the “Buffett Rule” official policy (in his State of the Union speech in January, President Obama invoked it as a proposed 30 percent minimum tax on incomes over $1 million), Bloomberg Businessweek compiled some of the criticisms of Buffett and his namesake rule—and the instances when the Oracle of Omaha deigned to respond.

“He should just write a check and shut up. Really. And just contribute. OK? I mean, the fact of the matter is that I’m tired of hearing about it. If he wants to give the government more money, he has the ability to write a check. Go ahead and write it.” —New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, Feb. 22, 2012, regarding the Buffett Rule

Buffett’s Response:
“It’s sort of a touching response to a $1.2 trillion deficit, isn’t it? That somehow the American people will all send in checks and take care of it?” —Feb. 27, 2012

“If he’s feeling guilty about it, I think he should send in a check. … But we don’t want to stagnate this economy by raising taxes.” —Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Sept. 18, 2011, regarding the Buffett Rule

Buffett’s Response:
“It’s sort of astounding to me that somebody that has the responsibility for being the Minority Leader in the Senate would think that you attack a $1.2 trillion or so deficit by asking for voluntary contributions.” —Feb. 27, 2012

“If Warren Buffett believes that he is not paying enough taxes, then he should write a check today to the United States Treasury.” —Representative Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), Sept. 19, 2011, regarding the Buffett Rule

“I think Mr. Buffett is a real intelligent individual, but I can promise you, he doesn’t know what’s going on in places where the job creation is at a zero because of over-taxation and over-regulation.” —Texas Governor Rick Perry, Sept. 29, 2011, regarding the Buffett Rule

“If Warren Buffett really believes in BYD’s electric car technology, then why doesn’t he drive a BYD car instead of an American car? Doesn’t that tell you something about what he really thinks of BYD?” —Terry Gou, chairman and founder of Hon Hai Precision Industry (HNHPF) and Foxconn, June 9, 2011 (Buffett is an investor in BYD, Hon Hai’s competitor. The two companies were embroiled in an intellectual property lawsuit)

“Class warfare will simply divide this country more. It will attack job creators, divide people, and it doesn’t grow the economy. Class warfare may make for really good politics, but it makes for rotten economics.” —Representative Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), Sept. 18, 2011, regarding the Buffett Rule

“I pay over 30 percent every year. I don’t feel undertaxed in any way at all.” —Jack Welch, Feb. 22, 2012, regarding the Buffett Rule

“Buffett has skirted our attention for many years and he will be in our crosshairs. He has made a bet on coal being around for longer than we anticipate, and we are going to make sure he never sees that dream.” —Bruce Nilles, director of Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal campaign, Dec. 22, 2011, referring to Berkshire Hathaway’s investments in coal

“Apparently, Warren Buffett thinks that the best way to get out of debt is to go deeper into debt. I agree with his premise that the dollar’s going to go down—and that there’s a lot of inflation in the future, and it’s a problem—but I disagree that he supports the Obama administration, Congress, all the actions they’re doing now that are causing these problems. Apparently, Warren Buffett thinks the short-term benefits of inflation outweigh the long-term pain of suffering inflation. He is dead wrong.” —Peter Schiff, chief of Euro Pacific Capital, Aug. 19, 2009, regarding Buffett’s support of federal stimulus during the financial crisis

“What is this? Is he completely a socialist and he’s playing into Mr. Obama’s hands of ‘Tax anyone who makes money’ and give it to people who don’t work?” —Eric Bolling, Fox News host, Aug. 15, 2011, regarding Buffett’s column in the Times

“He wants to raise taxes on other people, but he doesn’t want to pay a dime more than he has to pay. And he doesn’t trust Washington with his money, either.” —Representative Tim Huelskamp (R-Kan.), Nov. 6, 2011, regarding the Buffett Rule

“[I] resent that Warren Buffett and others who have created massive wealth for themselves think I’m ‘coddled’ because they believe they should pay more in taxes. I certainly don’t feel ‘coddled’ because these various governments have not imposed a higher income tax.” —Harvey Golub, former CEO of American Express, Aug. 22, 2011, regarding Buffett’s Times column

“They are paying for national defense, infrastructure, basic research, education. And when you have a small group providing all of the government to the rest of America, it strikes me as exceedingly weird to say ‘Pony up.’ They’ve already paid for the whole thing. Why are we asking for more?” —Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a top economic adviser to President George W. Bush who now runs the American Action Forum, Feb. 4, 2012, regarding the Buffett Rule

“The President is promoting and marketing a Buffett Rule policy that he may never produce and that it appears he may not really want Congress to enact. That’s vaporware.” —Keith Hennessey, former Assistant to the U.S. President for Economic Policy and Director of the U.S. National Economic Council, Feb. 22, 2012, regarding the Buffett Rule

Buffett goes big in Big Blue -

Tuesday, November 15, 2011 0 comments


Non-techie Warren Buffett buys more IBM shares for Berkshire Hathaway than Watson could probably guess.

By Carol Loomis, senior editor-at-large


FORTUNE -- A tech stock for Buffett? Yes, a very big tech stock, and a walloping part of it, too.


Warren Buffett, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway and up to now a famous avoider of tech stocks, disclosed today on CNBC that his company has accumulated a huge investment in IBM. Berkshire spent about $10.7 billion this year to buy 64 million IBM shares, acquiring a bold 5.5% stake in the company.
IBM's nearly $100 billion in revenues last year made it the 18th-largest company in the Fortune 500. Companies of that size, sporting huge market caps as well, are a prerequisite for Buffett when he is doing what he wants to do -- commit billions of Berkshire's money to a new investment. Small-cap stocks just can't absorb enough of Berkshire's dollars to count.
Buffett has been patiently buying IBM since March -- 64 million shares don't cascade in overnight. On the figures he's announced, $10.7 billion for 64 million IBM (IBM) shares, Berkshire's average cost-per-share works out to about $167 (though Buffett rounded that to $170 in his CNBC conversation this morning).
IBM's stock closed last Friday at $187.38 a share, which means that Berkshire currently has a gain in its position of more than 10%. IBM has been a strong market leader this year, rising more than 25% versus a 2% rise for the Dow Jones Industrials.
At IBM's current price, Berkshire's 64 million shares have a market value of a little more than $12 billion. Were Buffett today to list Berkshire's (BRKA) largest stockholdings, as he does every year in the company's annual report, IBM would rank behind only Coca-Cola (KO). Berkshire's 200 million shares of Coke have a current market value of about $13.6 billion.
Talking on CNBC, Buffett complimented Lou Gerstner for picking IBM up off the ground, setting it on a growth path, and ultimately picking a first-class successor, Sam Palmisano, who became CEO in 2002. As Fortune noted in an article about Palmisano and IBM early this year (IBM's Sam Palmisano: A super second act), he has since 2002 powered earnings to $11.52 per share in 2010, broadened IBM's geographical reach, and expanded the company's supercomputing and analytics businesses—hello, Jeopardy champ Watson.
What's more, Buffett approvingly noted that Palmisano has done it all with a stated, publicized plan and met every objective. Buffett said that Palmisano has "delivered big-time."
One of Palmisano's goals was to return money to shareholders, both by raising IBM's dividend -- it's quintupled since 2002 -- and repurchasing large quantities of IBM's stock. In Palmisano's tenure, IBM has bought more than 30% of its shares.
Buffett has always been a strong believer in companies buying their own stock when it's undervalued, which clearly both he and Palmisano have considered IBM to be. Commenting toFortune in the 1980s about stock buybacks made at intelligent prices, Buffett said they were close to "a polygraph" for determining whether a management was acting in the shareholders' interest.
In a sense, Buffett and Palmisano have been in competition for IBM's stock this year. While Berkshire was paying its $10.7 billion for 64 million shares, IBM itself spent nearly $11.5 billion in 2011's first nine months to buy almost 69 million shares.
IBM's cost-per-share for the stock it repurchased in those nine months was about $167 -- just what Berkshire's cost is on the facts that Buffett has announced for the March-into-November period.
Buffett has not met Palmisano (whose name Buffett bobbled once today) nor his just-announced successor, Virginia Rometty, who will take over as CEO at yearend. Buffett, however, was in the audience at Fortune's Most Powerful Women's conference in early October when Rometty was a featured speaker. (In a 1-out-of-365 chance, or less considering Leap Year, Palmisano and Rometty share the same birthday, July 29th; is that an omen of some kind?)
Palmisano, 60, is to stay on as IBM's chairman and will no doubt be unflaggingly watching what happens under IBM's latest stated, publicized plan, called the 2015 Roadmap. The plan calls for operating earnings per share to rise from $11.67 in 2010 to at least $20 in 2015. More buybacks are also on the agenda, though naturally they will need to be made at prices that don't make the polygraph blow a gasket.
Buffett said today that if IBM got its shares down to 64 million -- Berkshire's holding, that is -- he'd be happy. That won't happen, of course, but Buffett probably figured it wouldn't hurt to give IBM a nudge.
Fortune senior editor-at-large Carol Loomis, who wrote this article, is a long-time friend of Warren Buffett's and a Berkshire shareholder.

 
CrackleTech © 2011 | Designed by WetCanvas Inc.